A Comprehensive Motion Compensation Method for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Motion in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) acquisitions of focal liver lesions are affected by motion, which has an impact on contrast signal quantification. We therefore developed and tested, in a large patient cohort, a motion compensation algorithm called the Iterative Local Search Algorithm (ILSA), which can correct for both periodic and non-periodic in-plane motion and can reject frames with out-of-plane motion. CEUS cines of 183 focal liver lesions in 155 patients from three hospitals were used to develop and test ILSA. Performance was evaluated through quantitative metrics, including the root mean square error and R2 in fitting time-intensity curves and standard deviation value of B-mode intensities, computed across cine frames), and qualitative evaluation, including B-mode mean intensity projection images and parametric perfusion imaging. The median root mean square error significantly decreased from 0.032 to 0.024 (p < 0.001). Median R2 significantly increased from 0.88 to 0.93 (p < 0.001). The median standard deviation value of B-mode intensities significantly decreased from 6.2 to 5.0 (p < 0.001). B-Mode mean intensity projection images revealed improved spatial resolution. Parametric perfusion imaging also exhibited improved spatial detail and better differentiation between lesion and background liver parenchyma. ILSA can compensate for all types of motion encountered during liver CEUS, potentially improving contrast signal quantification of focal liver lesions.

Contrast-enhanced US in Pediatric Patients: Overview of Bowel Applications.

Contrast material-enhanced US is a technique that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the characterization of liver lesions and intravesicular applications in children; however, contrast-enhanced US has several other pediatric applications in clinical practice. The most common application is for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Contrast-enhanced US can be used to diagnose IBD, distinguish regions of active or chronic inflammation of the bowel wall, and evaluate associated complications such as abscesses, fistulas, and strictures. Dynamic contrast material evaluation provides qualitative and quantitative information about mural and mesenteric blood flow, which is essential in the determination of disease activity in these patients. It also has the potential to provide a means of monitoring the response to therapy beyond endoscopy or MR enterography. In addition to its use for IBD, contrast-enhanced US can be used to assess for bowel perfusion when problem solving in patients with necrotizing enterocolitis, neonatal bowel infarction, or intussusception. It is a useful imaging technique to fortify diagnoses that may otherwise be indeterminate, such as appendicitis, epiploic appendagitis, intraluminal bowel masses, and complex cysts. Finally, innovative applications such as shear-wave elastography have the potential to provide information about the stiffness of the bowel wall. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Watson and Humphries.

Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Crohn Disease: Their Role in Disease Activity Determination With Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to examine the association between contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) parameters and established gray-scale ultrasound with color Doppler imaging (CDI) for the determination of disease activity in patients with Crohn disease. Our secondary objective was to develop quantitative time-signal intensity curve thresholds for disease activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients with Crohn disease underwent ultrasound with CDI and CEUS. Reviewers graded wall thickness, inflammatory fat, and mural blood flow as showing remission or inflammation (mild, moderate, or severe). If both gray-scale ultrasound and CDI predicted equal levels of disease activity, the studies were considered concordant. If ultrasound images suggested active disease not supported by CDI findings, the ultrasound results for disease activity were indeterminate. Time-signal intensity curves from CEUS were acquired with calculation of peak enhancement (PE), and AUCs. Interobserver variation and associations between PE and ultrasound parameters were examined. Multiclass ROC analysis was used to develop CEUS thresholds for activity. RESULTS: Ninety-six (76%) studies were concordant, 19 of which showed severe disease, and 31 (24%) studies were indeterminate. Kappa analyses revealed good interobserver agreement on grades for CDI (κ = 0.76) and ultrasound (κ = 0.80) assessments. PE values on CEUS and wall thickness showed good association with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient for the entire population (ρ = 0.62, p < 0.01) and for the concordant group (ρ = 0.70, p < 0.01). Multiclass ROC analyses of the concordant group using wall thickness alone as the reference standard showed cutoff points of 18.2 dB for differentiating mild versus moderate activity (sensitivity, 89.0% and specificity, 87.0%) and 23.0 dB for differentiating moderate versus severe (sensitivity, 90% and specificity, 86.8%). Almost identical cutoff points were observed when using ultrasound global assessment as the reference standard: using 18.2 dB to differentiate mild versus moderate activity yielded sensitivity of 89.2% and specificity of 90.9% and using 22.9 dB to differentiate moderate versus severe activity yielded sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 83.1%. CONCLUSION: Quantitative CEUS parameters integrated into inflammatory assessments with ultrasound reduce indeterminate results and improve disease activity level determinations.